No child left behind is bad for schools students and teachers essay

Narrow Curriculum A student at an elementary school in Maryland described her day this way: Then we go to Mrs. Then after lunch we read.

No child left behind is bad for schools students and teachers essay

Many bad policies in history were surely paved with good intentions. For instance, President Lyndon Johnson's "Great Society" was intended to dramatically reduce poverty and, in Johnson's words, "elevate hope. According to President George W.

Bush, he wanted to "enact a plan to improve all of America's public schools, so that no child is left behind. It passed in the House on 13 May by —45, and it passed in the Senate on 14 June by 91—8.

According to the bill, students in the schools must pass standardized tests. If an insufficient number pass the first year, there are no sanctions. If the parents decide to do so, then the transportation is provided by the school district of where the child lives. If the school fails a third year, then the school must pay for supplemental educational services for the students.

If they fail a fourth year, then management restructuring takes place. On the fifth year of failure, all staff are replaced, and the school could turn into a charter or private school.

There are rare instances where extreme advocates on both the Left and Right agree on public policy and are opposed to a specific program. This is one of those instances, and for good reason.

No child left behind is bad for schools students and teachers essay

Notable and respected conservative George Will claims that the program "spawned lowered standards. Williams, another respected conservative and a professor of economics at George Mason University, condemned the program "that billions of dollars are spent on.

As for the typical parent who still believes his or her child attends an above-average school, what will happen when many of them learn they are wrong? Barack Obama said of the act, "don't come up with this law called No Child Left Behind and then leave the money behind.

I am opposed to the program from a libertarian, government-reduction perspective.

The Trouble with No Child Left Behind

The No Child Left Behind legislation has vastly increased standardized tests and created a muddle of federal regulations with results opposite from their intentions. At first glance, the concept of standardized tests seems reasonable. Children should be tested, and the tests are clear indicators either of how intelligent they are or of how much the school is teaching them.

But what is the school "teaching" them, exactly? The answer is simple but unfortunate: Linda Valli, Maryland associate professor of education, conducted a long study on the federal program and determined that standardized testing "actually undermined the quality of teaching in reading and math" and that the decline in teacher quality and tangible information being taught to the students is because of "the pressure teachers were feeling to 'teach to the test.

One infamous criticism that English teachers gave concerned the time spent on the proper use of a comma as opposed to on developmental writing skills. As Richard and JoAnne Vacca noted in their book, Content Area Reading, "good readers are often good writers," and "wide reading improves writing.

Virtually no person, however, would seriously argue that in the real world, reading comprehension is less important than knowing where to put a comma or knowing what verbs and nouns are.

This is especially true in the real world of contracts, newspapers, etc. NCLB is simply a way for the federal government to tighten its grip on schools by threatening them with punishment. Those who control the schools control the future. The tests and regulations indirectly control what children learn in school and what they do not learn in school.

One should keep in mind, however, what Kohn said regarding the scores: Surely the rate of graduations is reflective of school quality and efficiency, which No Child Left Behind was supposed to improve.NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND HALEY PAULK COLUMBUS STATE UNIVERSITY Abstract The No Child Left Behind Act of is an educational reform in public school systems that caused much controversy in the last decade.

This educational reform could be characterized as he cornerstone of George W. Bush’s administration. The No Child Left Behind Act Essay - Initiated in , the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of intended to prevent the academic failures of educational institutions and individual students, as well as bridge achievement gaps between students.

Since the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) law took effect in , it has had a sweeping impact on U.S. public school classrooms. It affects what students are taught, the tests they take, the training of their teachers and the way money is spent on education.

(The Impact of No Child Left Behind) This is because teachers from different public schools all across North America ended up raising the scores in math and reading in their students. The schools can also benefit from this act, as well as the children and their families.

Search Mises Daily

The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) was signed by President Obama on December 10, , and represents good news for our nation’s schools. The previous version of the law, the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act, was enacted in updated law was necessary to expand opportunity to all students; support schools, teachers, and.

The No Child Left Behind Act of (No Child Left Behind) is a landmark in education reform designed to improve student achievement and change the culture of America's schools.

President George W. Bush describes this law as the "cornerstone of my administration." Clearly, our children are our.

The Trouble with No Child Left Behind | Mises Institute